The health care sector is enormous and entails hundreds of purchases that move millions of dollars daily. According to the National Health Care Anti-Fraud Association, an approximated $100 billion is lost to Medicare scams every single year in the U.S., with ill-used law enforcement agencies depending greatly on whistleblowers to bring Medicare and Medicaid waste, abuse, and fraud to their interest.
This is why the federal government counts so heavily on whistleblowers to uncover proof of committing Medicare scams, and that is why, under the qui tam stipulations, the government legislation shields whistleblowers from revenge and gives such a profitable financial motivation to blow the whistle on presumed fraudulence within the medical care system.
The anti-retaliation arrangement of the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(h), is usually considered as more protective of whistleblowers than various other statutes that give an avenue for private citizens to report evidence of devoting Medicare whistleblower rewards Oberheiden scams or transgression to police and submit a qui tam suit.
Since it is so near for companies to strike back against health care employees that blow the whistle on misconduct happening within the company, whistleblower laws forbid workplace retaliation and provide the sufferers of it legal choice if it occurs anyhow.
Even a whistleblower honor that is closer to 15 percent of the proceeds of the situation can be substantial, specifically if the instance is filed under the False Claims Act. Nonetheless, several of these regulations, like the False Claims Act, attend to higher problems and even more compensation than your normal wrongful discontinuation case in an attempt to hinder whistleblower revenge.